Franchise Tax Board (FTB) publishes articles focusing on common audit issues. |
Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Audit Issues The FTB has published articles that focus on common audit issues for both individual and business entity taxpayers. This article focuses on individual taxpayers. Six common tax audit issues currently affecting personal income taxpayers are: The FTB continues to identify IRC Section 1031 tax issues (Like-Kind-Exchange) including erroneous boot calculations, improper property identifications, and "drop and swap transactions.” Schedule D Securities Transactions Common audit issues involving Schedule D securities transactions include overstated stock basis, unreported option premium income, and regulated futures contracts. Rental Real Estate Losses Generally, losses from passive activities, including rental real estate, may be deducted only up to the amount of income from passive activities. Any excess loss is carried forward to the following year or years until the interest in the activity is disposed in a fully taxable transaction. In some cases, a taxpayer may classify rental activities as nonpassive for federal purposes. However, for California purposes rental activities are generally considered passive, with a few exceptions. Residency We continue to audit residency issues. The determination of a taxpayer's residency status is a facts and circumstances issue. In making this determination, we consider where the taxpayer has the closest connections and whether or not they receive substantial benefits and protection from California. Head of Household (HOH) Filing Status We continue to see adjustments where the qualifying individual's income exceeds the gross income test of $3,700. We also see inconsistent reporting of HOH for Registered Domestic Partners (RDP). For tax years 2007 and later, RDPs must file their California income tax returns using either the Married/RDP filing jointly or Married/RDP filing separately filing status. An RDP may qualify to use the HOH filing only if the requirements are met to be considered not in a registered domestic partnership. Source: |